Free HIE Gap Assessment
Most regional HIE and quality-reporting platforms were built for a world of batch files and manual chart review. Take the 2-minute assessment below to see exactly which gaps apply to you — and how HDIM closes them incrementally, using AI-native infrastructure, without a rip-and-replace.
These are the gaps we hear most often from health plans, health systems, ACOs, and HIEs. Every HDIM capability below is demo-validated, not a roadmap promise.
Data arrives late — batch or nightly, not real-time
FHIR-native event pipeline built for real-time throughput: 92ms P95 CQL evaluation at 100 concurrent users, with per-service SLOs (P95 < 200ms) validated under load — not projected.
Care gaps are found after the visit, not before it
Care gap detection runs against live FHIR data, so gaps surface in the workflow instead of during a retrospective chart review weeks later.
HEDIS / quality reporting is manual and spreadsheet-driven
A live CQL execution engine handling batch and individual measure evaluation, QRDA export, and HCC risk stratification — 10 HEDIS measures live today, expanding to the full library.
Your "FHIR-compliant" vendor is only partially compliant
FHIR R4 native — 26 documented API endpoints including the $everything operation, SMART on FHIR, C-CDA parsing, and HL7 v2 processing, built and tested for real interoperability.
Audit trails and access controls were bolted on later
100% PHI access logged via an HTTP audit interceptor and @Audited annotation on every access method, with database-level tenant isolation and role-based access control from day one.
Any real fix looks like a multi-year rip-and-replace project
A modular, microservices architecture lets you start with one measure, one care setting, or one data source — and expand phase by phase on a documented 90-day pilot blueprint, not a multi-year program.
Because HDIM was built on a modular, AI-native microservices architecture, your team can start with a single measure, a single care setting, or a single data feed — validate it against your own data — and expand from there. That's the same phased model behind our documented 90-day pilot blueprint: clear Phase 1 scope, a security baseline, deployment model options, and KPI governance defined up front.
Tell us where it hurts, and we'll send back a tailored breakdown of the gaps you flagged, mapped to HDIM capabilities and a suggested incremental rollout.